Better memory B cells, T cells, and longer lasting antibodies. It is no competition. Natural immunity is better and it is becoming clear we should have let the virus do its thing while protecting old people, promoting health, and locking up most pharmaceutical executives.
It's crazy that there was no talk of memory T and B cells over the pandemic, and only about having a constant supply of antibodies, which has never been necessary for any disease. That makes it clear that all the talk of antibodies was simply to force compliance and sell more vaccines. That's what you get when the government enforces pharmaceutical use based on the recommendation of the companies(or those protecting their interests) that are selling said pharmaceutical.
The scary part was always the fact that the vaccines do create memory B cells -- but they stop adapting after 2-6 months. In other words, they get locked in, which explains a lot right about now...
And for those keeping score, my personal experience in primary care is as follows:
1. Patient death from covid before vaccines were available - typical high risk person in his 70s with DM, CAD, HTN, CKD
1. Friend who died in his 40s from embolic strokes starting 7d after second Pfizer vaccine (no prior health issues)
1. Friend with retinal vein occlusion after vaccination (no prior health issues)
1. Friend in his 70s that died of MI 7d after second Pfizer (prior CAD hx, certainly could be coincidental...)
1. Colleague with transverse myelitis resulting in incomplete paraplegia that developed immediately after second Pfizer vaccine
I did just watch the video in the next gato post which is completely consistent with my experiences as well as the ER numbers previously posted showing the stunning increase in CV and neuro complaints in Germany since the advent of vaccination.
I feel like I live in a parallel universe of medicine where "first do no harm" has been replaced with "injury and death of healthy young and middle aged people is an acceptable outcome from an intervention that will not benefit them".
"injury and death of healthy young and middle aged people is an acceptable outcome from an intervention that will not benefit them" - LMAO
A bit (LOL) long but yea that about sums it up for the majority of medical "professionals". If they aren't doing or advocating for early treatments with IVM/HCQ/+ then they are worthless as doctors and dispicable as humans to let people suffer and die needlessly.
And medical students are having this taught and reenforced as we speak. One of my medical schools sent out the booster schedule for med. Students this week. All will get it with out thought.
Heartbreaking, yes. Terrifying when we realize that a whole generation of children around the world is being exposed to this idiocy and more so given that I am referring to medical students. These will be the doctors we will have to see as we age and who will be entrusted with the health care of our children and grandchildren.
I'm certain that many of them will suffer health issues from the jabs. Especially as they keep up with the boosters. We may end up having to learn about herbal and nutritional remedies to alleviate our geriatric issues. I suspect that the number of doctors will dwindle in the next 10 years.
Today I saw my first vaccine protest. Two people. Both unmasked, with myself and one other, that makes 4 unmasked people out and about while I went shopping today.
Last week I was a simulated patient for 55 medical students. All but 4 wore masks for the simulated medical interview over ZOOM. My child wears a mask 10 hours a day. I had to fight with one of my employers who demanded that I wear a mask for online lessons conducted from my home. All the other teachers do so.
True, Japan has no mandates. However, Japan does not need mandates. The government only need to recommend what they wish to mandate and everyone falls into line. Last Sunday I was told to put on a mask in my local 100 Yen store. The Emergency Declaration was lifted Nov. 1st.
Do your colleagues see this? Is it really that they don’t see or is everyone just too scared to speak? Seems like maybe when the medical boards are warning about the significant uptick in misinformation coming FROM PHYSICIANS maybe we need to redefine what qualifies as misinformation…
It is really a crazy situation. I find that a lot of the non-academic docs are the ones more likely to question the whole situation. The academic ones seem to be more aligned with the "system" and are drinking the kool-aid. I don't know exactly what they are seeing, to be fair, but the water-cooler chat is far more honest than the public persona and discourse. I know many docs in my small circle that do not favor mandates and, at a minimum, question the rationale of vaccinating healthy kids. Few are willing to speak their minds and I think they fear getting publicly shamed by an ID specialist or hospital admin. We have been functioning as sheep for so long that it is hard to now expect the rank and file to grow a collective spine and challenge the system. I challenged the CEO of our local hospital system to recognize natural immunity as part of the vaccine mandate, and he did have a sympathetic ear to be fair. In the end, however, the federal mandate tied his hands. In follow up, the local system put their mandate on hold as soon as the courts started striking down the mandate. Was too late for most staff who had either quit or complied by that time.
It might seem that Fauci (assisted by Gates) once thought vaccines were mankind's answer to all sickness. Having adopted that position they refuse to look at data suggesting this virus using this vaccine are not behaving. As long as they remain in place noting can change. Gates at least is evolving, having made most the money already.
“the order of occurrence matters greatly”—I find this of particular interest given the statement I shared from Dr. Malone about the vaccine only encoding for the spike protein, which leaves 28 proteins the vaxxed’s immune system is unable to mount a response to. If the infection occurs prior to vaccination, however, natural immunity has been developed, putting the person in a better position to fight off breakthrough infection post-injection (actually, does anyone know if breakthrough infections occur for those who achieved natural immunity prior to injection?) …
DR. MIKE YEADON: It’s actively dangerous to vaccinate a person known to be already immune to the protein used in a vaccine.
In this case, we aren’t using conventional, protein-based agents. Usually this takes the form of the pathogen itself, grown in culture, then killed by heating or by adding a chemical which breaks up the protein. This format of vaccine has a century-long record of protecting people from infection by that pathogen as well as to prevent clinical illness. It’s the base case that they usually attenuate if not halt transmission. Finally, with rare exceptions, they’re generally very safe. So they should be. In fact, MUST be. Why? Because the contract is this: a perfectly healthy person shows up at the clinic. They get vaccinated. They leave in the same good health & will remain so.
There is no situation in which it’s acceptable even for a minority to be injured, crippled or killed by a vaccine.
Like I said, on rare occasion, and we don’t understand why, a conventional vaccine turns out to have adverse effects (AEs). In 2009, a rushed vaccine against swine flu was determined to have killed a few dozen people & injured thousands (the most-noted, serious AE was narcolepsy, in which some people can slide into a form of sleep, without warning. The most infamous case was in Sweden, where hundreds of children were permanently damaged in this way. Compensation has been paid, iirc by the U.K. government.
Importantly, the vaccine was withdrawn.
It’s worth knowing that most countries simply simply couldn’t find the strain of influenza in question.
Though most people don’t know it, the whole event was faked by the pharmaceutical industry & well-placed academics. PCR testing, deliberately used badly, coupled with implausibly dire projections of a wave of deaths (from a notoriously unreliable modeller) & a corrupt WHO, orchestrating the criminal enterprise.
In all probability, tech companies have modified how browser searches no longer find much information about this fraud.
Some of you will recall Jon Snow of UK’s Channel 4 News interviewing a German physician, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg. Wodarg was a public health Doctor in a northern town in Germany. He was also a minor politician, having bern elected as our equivalent of an MP. As there were so few technically qualified people in Parliament, he became the leader of a medical subcommittee & ultimately of an EU liaison group. So it happened that Wolfgang, once he realised that it was a fraud, was able quickly to network & to build alliances, including within the EU & WHO. Eventually, those protecting the perpetrators realised they were discovered (eg the Channel 4 News interview) & declared the pandemic to be at an end. Billions in unused vaccines & ineffective antivirals were lost. No sanctions were placed upon the medical academics in China, who faked the number of sick & dead victims of Influenza-like illness. Nor on European academics who developed untrustworthy PCR tests Nor even on the pharmaceutical companies or their fellow conspirators in public offices responsible for negotiating contracts activated by WHO declaring a Pandemic and a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” (PHEIC: pronounced “fake”).
In brief, far fewer people died, even “with Swine Flu”, than the Imperial College modellers warned about.
Additionally, it turned out that the PCR test as specified was mostly finding false positives. The effect of this was the so-called “second wave” was retrospectively named as an example of a “PCR false positive pseudo epidemic”.
This has happened before, on more than one occasion, one of which is so stark that those who dismiss all of these facts as conspiracy theories still insist it’s impossible to fake pandemic.
The most notorious example of a genuine pseudo epidemic was of whooping cough. There was an apparent outbreak of hundreds of staff & patients at a hospital in north east USA. After weeks of panic, the final damaging explanation was that all the tests were performed in one PCR lab & there was invisible contamination of the laboratory bench.
NOT A SINGLE REAL CASE of whooping cough was identified by bacterial culture of clinical specimens. Furthermore, none of the apparently sick children or staff member was found to have circulating antibodies.
I believe that this was an honest mistake & all participants genuinely believed that the biggest outbreak of whooping cough had happened.
I recall being struck, upon first reading about this event, that it might well have been the inspiration for the covid19 fraud.
The novel technology, gene-based “vaccines” are nothing like conventional vaccines. I’m certain that the very design of them, all causing expression of spike protein, is the central & shared design flaw, and thus has led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, dominated by disorders of clotting & bleeding.
If a person who is immune to SARS-CoV-2 virus is then vaccinated, their risks of serious AEs & even death is greatly increased. No responsible doctor recommends this. We know for certain that this is true. It’s obvious & inevitable. Yet JCVI recommends vaccination even if recovered from the virus. You should have zero doubt that they know full well how dangerous this is.
Bottom line, most doctors are NOT “responsible” as it is used in the closing paragraph. They ARE responsible for the harm they are inflicting. Will they be held accountable?
Why didn't you name Neil Ferguson? I still try to read original sources, and finding him among the authors raises my credibility filter. Add any others you use as lie detectors. Thanks, R
Perhaps it's because I've now had to look through so many of these bogus reports, but I actually was able to spot the problem with the graph after a second.
Did this even account for symptomatic vs. not, or severe vs. mild illness?
Also, get ready for "hybrid immunity" as the next big fog, deliberately obfuscating the apparent nontrivial worsening of natural immunity from getting the vaccine first.
The "experts" now know the Cat is out of the bag.🐈I do think the average person (whatever that is) is so saturated with information that they have ended their personal search for the truth. The "experts are now in the if you can't win them over with facts, dazzle them with Bullshit.
Yes. Currently working on a piece about the new darn age we are experiencing: the age of noise. There is too much information to handle, and the information is hard to parse. The funny thing is the "experts" can hardly be trusted right now as there are no experts on this virus. It has not existed long enough. Doctors who are complaining they are overwhelmed due to covid (unlikely) treat the virus like another respiratory virus (when it appears to be a blood borne virus more than anything) and do not spend their off hours looking at the research. Researchers are getting paid a lot of money to steer their analysis in a certain way. The closest thing to experts there are may be among the group of people motivated to spend the most time of their days researching this subject (the ones with the boots on their throats right now). Luckily, a lot of us have excellent backgrounds in data analysis and science. Some are clearly grifting as well, but at least even the grifters are in favor of preserving our institutions (like the Nuremberg code). The fact that the other side wants to burn those institutions down in a complex situation that no one fully understands for unknown benefits is the most reckless attack on the western world in my lifetime.
I saw this chart on Twitter a couple of days ago and I was surprised, but not shocked, at the obfuscation going on by manipulation of the y-axis. A long time ago, at the beginning of my career, I used to review water supply flow and pressure reports from developers for the local water jurisdiction. Engineers play these sorts of games all the time, tweaking the presentation of tables to create an impression that is not actually supported by the data.
Truer words have never been spoken: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics."
I saw Biden with a nice little graph about a drop in gas prices, all due to his leadership brilliance of course. The line show a strong decline that looked impressive as long as you didn't look too closely. All it showed was a mere 2 cent drop in gas price over a 7 day period, but it was deceptively presented so that at a glance it looked like it was a huge drop.
I'd love to talk to the genius who created the chart and actually thinks that it moves the needle on approval. Would I address that person as "Commissar", "Fellow Worker", or "Citizen"?
A 2 cent drop in prices is equal to....well, a rounding error. Desperate times with 6.8% inflation. BTW if you know how they compute that inflation - say. a 1986 car is priced upwards because the new cars have standard equpment/options you couldn't get back then (e.g. anti-lock brakes, airbags etc), thereby significantly increasing its price, reducing actual inflationary cost of owning A CAR. The fact remains that owning a car is far more expensive and most people don't care about options or govt required standard equipment when they need to get from point a to point b. IOW, the inflation numbers are far higher. It's total b.s. Based on a more correct "basket" of goods you could buy then versus now, inflation YOY is likely about double that. And now...we know the true cost of government malfeasance and incessant borrowing, shutting businesses for months or years because of "creative charting"
That first set of plots is stunning. As somebody who makes a living analyzing data, that is one of the most obscene examples of misleading data presentation that I have ever seen. The authors should be considered as having lost all credibility. And it is extremely unlikely that any competent data analyst would have let that pass unintentionally.
We Chartruese (covid-recovered, un-jabbed) are the best hope for humanity, but are seen as the villains. Thanks for always helping to point out stuff like this.
I chose it because it isn't on any special interest group ribbon, yet. We are now an outcast, downcast group who needs protection! And a lapel ribbon. Can't be a serious group without a lapel ribbon.
unfortunately, that's become a near impossible cohort to select for accurately.
you cannot prove a negative like that.
"never diagnosed with covid" and "never had covid" look the same in the patient data, but are impossible to separate accurately without doing some kind of pathogen challenge test with blood. not even an antibody test would really manage it.
makes it really hard to get a cohort of any scale.
It's possible but expensive, and not profitable. The research labs can do flow cytometry on B-cells and then check induced antibody responses. It's as manual and tedious as it sounds.
Take the time to read the actual study linked here and learn it and be ready to reference it when challenged. We can only beat this if we know our stuff and can defend our position. More great work, gato.
And here is an important pearl from the discussion section:
"Our data on Covid-19 hospitalized patients with severe disease has too few cases for a definitive analysis but does not seem to support a recent report 22 that suggests that vaccinated individuals were more protected than previously infected individuals 3 to 6 months after the immunity-conferring event."
Let me translate, "the study cited by Dr. Walensky and her cronies in the USA claiming vaccination is 5x better than natural immunity is a useless and totally bogus turd. We just don't have enough power in our study to refute it directly so we added this backhanded comment. We suggest you (the global body of medicine) ignore any statements made by Dr. Walensky or Dr. Fauci as they cite bad data to support their preferred narrative that your immune system is useless without their shots" - okay, so maybe I did editorialize this just a bit for emphasis....
Walensky et al want to erase all prior observation and knowledge about natural immunity. Personally, I think it's pretty arrogant to claim (especially at this point in time) that man is able to create a a vax that supersedes natural immunity's ability to protect again illness. After many years of vaccine failure with mRNA vaxxes, it's quite a stretch to believe that suddenly they've got it right and have beat nature. I'm not buying it in the least. This is yet another mRNA failure.
The hypothesis-- presented as a conclusion-- developed around the same time the new "vaccines" were released, was that vaccine-modulated immunity to this virus would be superior to that gained by infection. That was a very strange cart being put before the horse. The subsequent, continued attempts to justify this conclusion are just as lousy as one would expect from a total abandonment of the scientific method.
If I were grading this science fair project, I'd say go back to the drawing board and find a project you're really curious about, not a faith-based exercise you're hoping to exploit the tools of science for the purposes of proselytizing.
"if you get vaxxed first, then get sick, you never develop the full panoply of responses...but this does not happen if you get sick first, then vaxxed. because you already learned those things"
Given the unknown long-term safety data surrounding the vaxxes, and given the *known* problems with the vaxxes already, the fact I quoted above seems to me so argue strongly *against* being vaxxed if you've already had the WuFlu.
That is, if your immune system has "already learned those things", why eff with it by then getting vaxxed?
I haven't clinical data, but it appears that the "Delta" variant was actually "Vaxx" injuries. The peak deaths and cases followed the injections very closely. Remember that the "Spike" protein is actually an endothelial toxin, so Wuhan Covid and "Vaxx" injury look quite similar.
The chemistry looks pretty good for identifying spike variants, the PCR tests are lies used to support the numbers needed for the "narrative", and be very careful of infection claims which are not properly "seasonally adjusted" the way economic/job statistics are.
Review the northern hemisphere 2020 covid infection stats, corrupt as they are, and compare with an average influenza season, maybe 2016. Flat in the summer, despite no masks, no lockdowns, no hysteria, Flu shots which wear off in 3-4 months.
"the risk of needing medical care from vaxx is about the same as the risk of getting PCR detectable virus. pile on the 25% “unable to do daily activities” and this looks like a rotten trade."
Gato - you forgot the real benefit: not being treated as a leper.
Nattymunes necessarily have better T-cell memory and avidity (especially for nucleocapsid), and are the ONLY kind of immunity that includes any chance at secretory IgA (snot). One does not get those things from arm-shots or soluble foreign protein fragments in the blood. It is surprising that among the millions upon millions of new immunology and virology housewife Ph.Ds that the media world has created recently, that somehow none of them realize that the Holy Sacrament they receive from their Pfriest never physically makes it to the needed location to provide any real-world immunity.
What is irking about that graphic is that no where is it disclosed that the graphs aren't covering all the same time frames. As a writer, I would make a point of outlining that in, at least, the footnotes to the graph itself, and would actually point it out in the text describing the results.
Better memory B cells, T cells, and longer lasting antibodies. It is no competition. Natural immunity is better and it is becoming clear we should have let the virus do its thing while protecting old people, promoting health, and locking up most pharmaceutical executives.
The last 5 words are extremely important: Locking up most pharmaceutical executives. And people like Fauci, I'll add.
It's crazy that there was no talk of memory T and B cells over the pandemic, and only about having a constant supply of antibodies, which has never been necessary for any disease. That makes it clear that all the talk of antibodies was simply to force compliance and sell more vaccines. That's what you get when the government enforces pharmaceutical use based on the recommendation of the companies(or those protecting their interests) that are selling said pharmaceutical.
The scary part was always the fact that the vaccines do create memory B cells -- but they stop adapting after 2-6 months. In other words, they get locked in, which explains a lot right about now...
And for those keeping score, my personal experience in primary care is as follows:
1. Patient death from covid before vaccines were available - typical high risk person in his 70s with DM, CAD, HTN, CKD
1. Friend who died in his 40s from embolic strokes starting 7d after second Pfizer vaccine (no prior health issues)
1. Friend with retinal vein occlusion after vaccination (no prior health issues)
1. Friend in his 70s that died of MI 7d after second Pfizer (prior CAD hx, certainly could be coincidental...)
1. Colleague with transverse myelitis resulting in incomplete paraplegia that developed immediately after second Pfizer vaccine
I did just watch the video in the next gato post which is completely consistent with my experiences as well as the ER numbers previously posted showing the stunning increase in CV and neuro complaints in Germany since the advent of vaccination.
I feel like I live in a parallel universe of medicine where "first do no harm" has been replaced with "injury and death of healthy young and middle aged people is an acceptable outcome from an intervention that will not benefit them".
"injury and death of healthy young and middle aged people is an acceptable outcome from an intervention that will not benefit them" - LMAO
A bit (LOL) long but yea that about sums it up for the majority of medical "professionals". If they aren't doing or advocating for early treatments with IVM/HCQ/+ then they are worthless as doctors and dispicable as humans to let people suffer and die needlessly.
I have answered this elsewhere, but you need to know:
Physicians are taught to believe, dogmatically, that vaccines save lives, are safe, and effective.
Calling experimental mRNA injections "Vaccines" was/is a triumph of "NewSpeak."
Joseph Goebbels would have been jealous of the propaganda campaign used to introduce "Deadly Covid."
95% of my former physician colleagues have no idea how the PCR test works and is manipulated.
And medical students are having this taught and reenforced as we speak. One of my medical schools sent out the booster schedule for med. Students this week. All will get it with out thought.
so sad, knowing that most of them do not need them but may be injured by them. I'm heartbroken for all young adults and kids.
Heartbreaking, yes. Terrifying when we realize that a whole generation of children around the world is being exposed to this idiocy and more so given that I am referring to medical students. These will be the doctors we will have to see as we age and who will be entrusted with the health care of our children and grandchildren.
I'm certain that many of them will suffer health issues from the jabs. Especially as they keep up with the boosters. We may end up having to learn about herbal and nutritional remedies to alleviate our geriatric issues. I suspect that the number of doctors will dwindle in the next 10 years.
But have no fear, medical and nursing students in Japan are getting their 3rd shot of the stuff!
Less tyranny in Japan, though, for the general population: https://youtu.be/W1jrdHs5HBE ~ and Ivermectin is also readily available.
Ivermectin has yet to be approved here. It is available mail order.
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2021/12/21/national/ivermectin-japan-covid19-little-evidence/?utm_source=pianoDNU&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=72&pnespid=4LGdmdALvvXW4PS5pUaj5OpJ5AEToyJ6gh4xRRY1okaV9kqPGnLCBuhpfVr6g3Fjwod1Qw
Today I saw my first vaccine protest. Two people. Both unmasked, with myself and one other, that makes 4 unmasked people out and about while I went shopping today.
Last week I was a simulated patient for 55 medical students. All but 4 wore masks for the simulated medical interview over ZOOM. My child wears a mask 10 hours a day. I had to fight with one of my employers who demanded that I wear a mask for online lessons conducted from my home. All the other teachers do so.
True, Japan has no mandates. However, Japan does not need mandates. The government only need to recommend what they wish to mandate and everyone falls into line. Last Sunday I was told to put on a mask in my local 100 Yen store. The Emergency Declaration was lifted Nov. 1st.
Thank you for the important context and clarification. Much appreciated.
Curious, where does the idea that Japan is using ivermectin come from? I have had many people ask about that in recent weeks.
Do your colleagues see this? Is it really that they don’t see or is everyone just too scared to speak? Seems like maybe when the medical boards are warning about the significant uptick in misinformation coming FROM PHYSICIANS maybe we need to redefine what qualifies as misinformation…
It is really a crazy situation. I find that a lot of the non-academic docs are the ones more likely to question the whole situation. The academic ones seem to be more aligned with the "system" and are drinking the kool-aid. I don't know exactly what they are seeing, to be fair, but the water-cooler chat is far more honest than the public persona and discourse. I know many docs in my small circle that do not favor mandates and, at a minimum, question the rationale of vaccinating healthy kids. Few are willing to speak their minds and I think they fear getting publicly shamed by an ID specialist or hospital admin. We have been functioning as sheep for so long that it is hard to now expect the rank and file to grow a collective spine and challenge the system. I challenged the CEO of our local hospital system to recognize natural immunity as part of the vaccine mandate, and he did have a sympathetic ear to be fair. In the end, however, the federal mandate tied his hands. In follow up, the local system put their mandate on hold as soon as the courts started striking down the mandate. Was too late for most staff who had either quit or complied by that time.
It is encouraging to hear even rumblings amongst the rank and file practitioners. I know first hand the fear and pressure not to speak.
R.F.Kennedy defines misinformation: https://twitter.com/Lukewearechange/status/1461407520933793811
It might seem that Fauci (assisted by Gates) once thought vaccines were mankind's answer to all sickness. Having adopted that position they refuse to look at data suggesting this virus using this vaccine are not behaving. As long as they remain in place noting can change. Gates at least is evolving, having made most the money already.
Another revelatory data-sleuthing exposé!
“the order of occurrence matters greatly”—I find this of particular interest given the statement I shared from Dr. Malone about the vaccine only encoding for the spike protein, which leaves 28 proteins the vaxxed’s immune system is unable to mount a response to. If the infection occurs prior to vaccination, however, natural immunity has been developed, putting the person in a better position to fight off breakthrough infection post-injection (actually, does anyone know if breakthrough infections occur for those who achieved natural immunity prior to injection?) …
That said, Dr. Mike Yeadon advises it is dangerous to vaccinate someone with natural immunity due to the heightened risk for adverse events, as per this recent comment (https://lauradodsworth.substack.com/p/i-love-my-job-but-i-wont-be-jabbed/comments):
DR. MIKE YEADON: It’s actively dangerous to vaccinate a person known to be already immune to the protein used in a vaccine.
In this case, we aren’t using conventional, protein-based agents. Usually this takes the form of the pathogen itself, grown in culture, then killed by heating or by adding a chemical which breaks up the protein. This format of vaccine has a century-long record of protecting people from infection by that pathogen as well as to prevent clinical illness. It’s the base case that they usually attenuate if not halt transmission. Finally, with rare exceptions, they’re generally very safe. So they should be. In fact, MUST be. Why? Because the contract is this: a perfectly healthy person shows up at the clinic. They get vaccinated. They leave in the same good health & will remain so.
There is no situation in which it’s acceptable even for a minority to be injured, crippled or killed by a vaccine.
Like I said, on rare occasion, and we don’t understand why, a conventional vaccine turns out to have adverse effects (AEs). In 2009, a rushed vaccine against swine flu was determined to have killed a few dozen people & injured thousands (the most-noted, serious AE was narcolepsy, in which some people can slide into a form of sleep, without warning. The most infamous case was in Sweden, where hundreds of children were permanently damaged in this way. Compensation has been paid, iirc by the U.K. government.
Importantly, the vaccine was withdrawn.
It’s worth knowing that most countries simply simply couldn’t find the strain of influenza in question.
Though most people don’t know it, the whole event was faked by the pharmaceutical industry & well-placed academics. PCR testing, deliberately used badly, coupled with implausibly dire projections of a wave of deaths (from a notoriously unreliable modeller) & a corrupt WHO, orchestrating the criminal enterprise.
In all probability, tech companies have modified how browser searches no longer find much information about this fraud.
Some of you will recall Jon Snow of UK’s Channel 4 News interviewing a German physician, Dr Wolfgang Wodarg. Wodarg was a public health Doctor in a northern town in Germany. He was also a minor politician, having bern elected as our equivalent of an MP. As there were so few technically qualified people in Parliament, he became the leader of a medical subcommittee & ultimately of an EU liaison group. So it happened that Wolfgang, once he realised that it was a fraud, was able quickly to network & to build alliances, including within the EU & WHO. Eventually, those protecting the perpetrators realised they were discovered (eg the Channel 4 News interview) & declared the pandemic to be at an end. Billions in unused vaccines & ineffective antivirals were lost. No sanctions were placed upon the medical academics in China, who faked the number of sick & dead victims of Influenza-like illness. Nor on European academics who developed untrustworthy PCR tests Nor even on the pharmaceutical companies or their fellow conspirators in public offices responsible for negotiating contracts activated by WHO declaring a Pandemic and a “Public Health Emergency of International Concern” (PHEIC: pronounced “fake”).
In brief, far fewer people died, even “with Swine Flu”, than the Imperial College modellers warned about.
Additionally, it turned out that the PCR test as specified was mostly finding false positives. The effect of this was the so-called “second wave” was retrospectively named as an example of a “PCR false positive pseudo epidemic”.
This has happened before, on more than one occasion, one of which is so stark that those who dismiss all of these facts as conspiracy theories still insist it’s impossible to fake pandemic.
The most notorious example of a genuine pseudo epidemic was of whooping cough. There was an apparent outbreak of hundreds of staff & patients at a hospital in north east USA. After weeks of panic, the final damaging explanation was that all the tests were performed in one PCR lab & there was invisible contamination of the laboratory bench.
NOT A SINGLE REAL CASE of whooping cough was identified by bacterial culture of clinical specimens. Furthermore, none of the apparently sick children or staff member was found to have circulating antibodies.
I believe that this was an honest mistake & all participants genuinely believed that the biggest outbreak of whooping cough had happened.
I recall being struck, upon first reading about this event, that it might well have been the inspiration for the covid19 fraud.
The novel technology, gene-based “vaccines” are nothing like conventional vaccines. I’m certain that the very design of them, all causing expression of spike protein, is the central & shared design flaw, and thus has led to hundreds of thousands of deaths, dominated by disorders of clotting & bleeding.
If a person who is immune to SARS-CoV-2 virus is then vaccinated, their risks of serious AEs & even death is greatly increased. No responsible doctor recommends this. We know for certain that this is true. It’s obvious & inevitable. Yet JCVI recommends vaccination even if recovered from the virus. You should have zero doubt that they know full well how dangerous this is.
Thank you for this information....it's very valuable and useful commentary....it's going into my reference files.
Great to hear. We are extremely fortunate to have Dr. Yeadon as part of the Substack community.
That was an excellent comment. I’ve copied it into a note file. Thanks.
Glad you found it useful! Dr. Yeadon deserves all the credit :-)
Bottom line, most doctors are NOT “responsible” as it is used in the closing paragraph. They ARE responsible for the harm they are inflicting. Will they be held accountable?
Why didn't you name Neil Ferguson? I still try to read original sources, and finding him among the authors raises my credibility filter. Add any others you use as lie detectors. Thanks, R
Not sure what you mean? This seems to be lacking context, or maybe you intended it as a response to someone else’s comment …
Sorry, I must have misfired- Imperial College was mentioned in one of the posts, I thought it was this one.R
Haha, thanks for clearing up the mystery!
Rereading Dr. Yeadon's post- he does mention the "notoriously unreliable modeller." We were supposed to have 100 million Covid deaths.
Perhaps it's because I've now had to look through so many of these bogus reports, but I actually was able to spot the problem with the graph after a second.
Did this even account for symptomatic vs. not, or severe vs. mild illness?
Also, get ready for "hybrid immunity" as the next big fog, deliberately obfuscating the apparent nontrivial worsening of natural immunity from getting the vaccine first.
The "experts" now know the Cat is out of the bag.🐈I do think the average person (whatever that is) is so saturated with information that they have ended their personal search for the truth. The "experts are now in the if you can't win them over with facts, dazzle them with Bullshit.
Yes. Currently working on a piece about the new darn age we are experiencing: the age of noise. There is too much information to handle, and the information is hard to parse. The funny thing is the "experts" can hardly be trusted right now as there are no experts on this virus. It has not existed long enough. Doctors who are complaining they are overwhelmed due to covid (unlikely) treat the virus like another respiratory virus (when it appears to be a blood borne virus more than anything) and do not spend their off hours looking at the research. Researchers are getting paid a lot of money to steer their analysis in a certain way. The closest thing to experts there are may be among the group of people motivated to spend the most time of their days researching this subject (the ones with the boots on their throats right now). Luckily, a lot of us have excellent backgrounds in data analysis and science. Some are clearly grifting as well, but at least even the grifters are in favor of preserving our institutions (like the Nuremberg code). The fact that the other side wants to burn those institutions down in a complex situation that no one fully understands for unknown benefits is the most reckless attack on the western world in my lifetime.
Best way to account for symptomatic vs not appears to be using rapid tests vs pcr tests. All these studies rely on pcr tests, so I'll go with no.
I saw this chart on Twitter a couple of days ago and I was surprised, but not shocked, at the obfuscation going on by manipulation of the y-axis. A long time ago, at the beginning of my career, I used to review water supply flow and pressure reports from developers for the local water jurisdiction. Engineers play these sorts of games all the time, tweaking the presentation of tables to create an impression that is not actually supported by the data.
Truer words have never been spoken: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics."
I saw Biden with a nice little graph about a drop in gas prices, all due to his leadership brilliance of course. The line show a strong decline that looked impressive as long as you didn't look too closely. All it showed was a mere 2 cent drop in gas price over a 7 day period, but it was deceptively presented so that at a glance it looked like it was a huge drop.
Here's the chart, sorry the link is so long:
https://www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=mr4fBBt1&id=5AE10BE4BCA6D357553F2730B400D1AB6004A4D3&thid=OIF.Q5RNa5XyEmbpLY7HjQmhDA&mediaurl=https%3a%2f%2fwww.autospies.com%2fimages%2fusers%2fAgent001%2fmain%2fscreenshot_12759.jpg&cdnurl=https%3a%2f%2fth.bing.com%2fth%2fid%2fR.9abe1f041b7537029659d1c453e09cd3%3frik%3d%26pid%3dImgRaw%26r%3d0&exph=537&expw=800&q=biden+chart+showing+2+cent+drop+in+gas+prices&simid=305000503545&FORM=IRPRST&ck=43944D6B95F21266E92D8EC78D09A10C&selectedIndex=0&idpp=overlayview&ajaxhist=0&ajaxserp=0
2 cents!!! Small victories for small men.
I'd love to talk to the genius who created the chart and actually thinks that it moves the needle on approval. Would I address that person as "Commissar", "Fellow Worker", or "Citizen"?
A 2 cent drop in prices is equal to....well, a rounding error. Desperate times with 6.8% inflation. BTW if you know how they compute that inflation - say. a 1986 car is priced upwards because the new cars have standard equpment/options you couldn't get back then (e.g. anti-lock brakes, airbags etc), thereby significantly increasing its price, reducing actual inflationary cost of owning A CAR. The fact remains that owning a car is far more expensive and most people don't care about options or govt required standard equipment when they need to get from point a to point b. IOW, the inflation numbers are far higher. It's total b.s. Based on a more correct "basket" of goods you could buy then versus now, inflation YOY is likely about double that. And now...we know the true cost of government malfeasance and incessant borrowing, shutting businesses for months or years because of "creative charting"
That first set of plots is stunning. As somebody who makes a living analyzing data, that is one of the most obscene examples of misleading data presentation that I have ever seen. The authors should be considered as having lost all credibility. And it is extremely unlikely that any competent data analyst would have let that pass unintentionally.
I can outdo that. Check out one of the guys that was used as a basis for the "myocarditis is worse from covid" argument.
https://jestre.substack.com/p/how-to-lie-with-statistics-mendel
How are they not charged with fraud or at least lose their jobs and titles for ethics violations?
We Chartruese (covid-recovered, un-jabbed) are the best hope for humanity, but are seen as the villains. Thanks for always helping to point out stuff like this.
Always wanted to be a brighter color...yes, Chartruese!!!
I chose it because it isn't on any special interest group ribbon, yet. We are now an outcast, downcast group who needs protection! And a lapel ribbon. Can't be a serious group without a lapel ribbon.
CHART-RUSE works too....most of the charts have been a ruse!
Did they actually get away with such a dishonest graph in their publication?
That's horrific.
I would love to see infection rates for unvaccinated without prior infection.
unfortunately, that's become a near impossible cohort to select for accurately.
you cannot prove a negative like that.
"never diagnosed with covid" and "never had covid" look the same in the patient data, but are impossible to separate accurately without doing some kind of pathogen challenge test with blood. not even an antibody test would really manage it.
makes it really hard to get a cohort of any scale.
Could this be one of the reasons that the control group was done away with in the "trials"?
Why would you think that? A second lieutenant wouldn't even dare think that.
It's possible but expensive, and not profitable. The research labs can do flow cytometry on B-cells and then check induced antibody responses. It's as manual and tedious as it sounds.
Take the time to read the actual study linked here and learn it and be ready to reference it when challenged. We can only beat this if we know our stuff and can defend our position. More great work, gato.
And here is an important pearl from the discussion section:
"Our data on Covid-19 hospitalized patients with severe disease has too few cases for a definitive analysis but does not seem to support a recent report 22 that suggests that vaccinated individuals were more protected than previously infected individuals 3 to 6 months after the immunity-conferring event."
Let me translate, "the study cited by Dr. Walensky and her cronies in the USA claiming vaccination is 5x better than natural immunity is a useless and totally bogus turd. We just don't have enough power in our study to refute it directly so we added this backhanded comment. We suggest you (the global body of medicine) ignore any statements made by Dr. Walensky or Dr. Fauci as they cite bad data to support their preferred narrative that your immune system is useless without their shots" - okay, so maybe I did editorialize this just a bit for emphasis....
Walensky et al want to erase all prior observation and knowledge about natural immunity. Personally, I think it's pretty arrogant to claim (especially at this point in time) that man is able to create a a vax that supersedes natural immunity's ability to protect again illness. After many years of vaccine failure with mRNA vaxxes, it's quite a stretch to believe that suddenly they've got it right and have beat nature. I'm not buying it in the least. This is yet another mRNA failure.
The hypothesis-- presented as a conclusion-- developed around the same time the new "vaccines" were released, was that vaccine-modulated immunity to this virus would be superior to that gained by infection. That was a very strange cart being put before the horse. The subsequent, continued attempts to justify this conclusion are just as lousy as one would expect from a total abandonment of the scientific method.
If I were grading this science fair project, I'd say go back to the drawing board and find a project you're really curious about, not a faith-based exercise you're hoping to exploit the tools of science for the purposes of proselytizing.
"if you get vaxxed first, then get sick, you never develop the full panoply of responses...but this does not happen if you get sick first, then vaxxed. because you already learned those things"
Given the unknown long-term safety data surrounding the vaxxes, and given the *known* problems with the vaxxes already, the fact I quoted above seems to me so argue strongly *against* being vaxxed if you've already had the WuFlu.
That is, if your immune system has "already learned those things", why eff with it by then getting vaxxed?
There you go again, trying to use logic🤣
My mind's ear heard Ronald Reagan's voice as I read that!
Sneaky. And is Omicron "mutation" a cover for OAS?
At the very least a cover for vaccine degrading + winter surge = storm. Can delay truth with boosters.
I haven't clinical data, but it appears that the "Delta" variant was actually "Vaxx" injuries. The peak deaths and cases followed the injections very closely. Remember that the "Spike" protein is actually an endothelial toxin, so Wuhan Covid and "Vaxx" injury look quite similar.
The chemistry looks pretty good for identifying spike variants, the PCR tests are lies used to support the numbers needed for the "narrative", and be very careful of infection claims which are not properly "seasonally adjusted" the way economic/job statistics are.
Review the northern hemisphere 2020 covid infection stats, corrupt as they are, and compare with an average influenza season, maybe 2016. Flat in the summer, despite no masks, no lockdowns, no hysteria, Flu shots which wear off in 3-4 months.
Then review 2021, see what you think.
Timing is suspect too. Delta was started hitting in December 2020, just as the vaccines were being rolled out.
"the risk of needing medical care from vaxx is about the same as the risk of getting PCR detectable virus. pile on the 25% “unable to do daily activities” and this looks like a rotten trade."
Gato - you forgot the real benefit: not being treated as a leper.
And an additional real benefit: contributing to the development of a "participation-by-license-only-society".
That is, or at least has become THE goal.
Nattymunes necessarily have better T-cell memory and avidity (especially for nucleocapsid), and are the ONLY kind of immunity that includes any chance at secretory IgA (snot). One does not get those things from arm-shots or soluble foreign protein fragments in the blood. It is surprising that among the millions upon millions of new immunology and virology housewife Ph.Ds that the media world has created recently, that somehow none of them realize that the Holy Sacrament they receive from their Pfriest never physically makes it to the needed location to provide any real-world immunity.
What is irking about that graphic is that no where is it disclosed that the graphs aren't covering all the same time frames. As a writer, I would make a point of outlining that in, at least, the footnotes to the graph itself, and would actually point it out in the text describing the results.